Diamond Systems Tritan Guia de Resolução de Problemas Página 11

  • Descarregar
  • Adicionar aos meus manuais
  • Imprimir
Vista de página 10
11
NOTE:
Reynolds number must be calculated for each area of the
mold having different cooling line diameters.
A water line in parallel should have the actual flow rate
recalculated if the measured flow occurs prior to branching.
A pressure differential of 0.138 MPa (20 psi) is typically
needed to achieve a good flow rate.
Table 1 Kinematic viscosity
for water
°C F)
Viscosity,
centistokes
0 (32) 1.79
4 (40) 1.54
10 (50) 1.31
16 (60) 1.12
21 (70) 0.98
27 (80) 0.86
32 (90) 0.76
38 (100) 0.69
49 (120) 0.56
60 (140) 0.47
71 (160) 0.40
82 (180) 0.35
93 (200) 0.31
100 (212) 0.28
It is common to find a pressure drop well below 0.138 MPa
(20 psi) from inlet to outlet supplies in molding shops. This
typically occurs when the number of molding machines has
been increased without upgrading the water supply system.
If there is a large temperature difference from inlet to outlet, it
is NOT an indication of good cooling. Rather, it can be a warning
that greater flow rates are required to remove even more heat.
The optimum condition for heat dissipation and removal is to
have only a few degrees of difference in temperature from inlet
to outlet.
Notes on cooling
Maintain a clean system. This can be achieved by:
– Glycol additives
– Rust inhibitors
– Stainless steel—no rust, but lower heat transfer
– Demineralized water
– Filtration
– Periodically flushing the coolant channels
Adding ethylene glycol increases the viscosity of the coolant.
Consequently, the convective heat transfer coefficient and
the rate of heat transferred from the mold are reduced. For
example, doubling the viscosity lowers the heat transfer
coefficient by 30%. A 10-fold increase in viscosity (50%
ethylene glycol compared to water) can reduce the coefficient
by a factor of 3.
Increasing cooling channel diameters without maintaining
velocity will result in a decrease in the total heat removed
in a given channel. If turbulent flow is maintained, empirical
correlations show that doubling the diameter while keeping
flow volume (gpm) constant results in approximately 40% less
heat transferred in spite of the fact that the area increases.
Theoretically, for turbulent flow, keeping the same coolant
velocity while increasing cooling channel diameter will provide
a significant increase in heat transferred to a given flow
channel. For example, if the diameter is doubled, the heat
transferred should increase approximately 80%.
Note, however, that if one follows the “rule of thumb” on
spacing of cooling channels, fewer larger diameter channels will
fit around the mold cavity and these will be farther away from
the hot plastic. This constraint makes it difficult to show real
gains in heat removal by increasing cooling channel diameter.
Vista de página 10
1 2 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 43 44

Comentários a estes Manuais

Sem comentários